Skip to toolbar

Defensive Scientists

Why are scientists more defensive about science than religionists are of religion? (question from Quora)

To me this question looks most interesting in relation to where I live, the US, at this moment in history. Since Trump’s election, the pendulum has swung wildly from science being the dominant rational means of discourse to imposition-by-faith being that means. Whether it’s faith in money-via-markets or morality-via-churchiness or justice-via-socal media, when it comes to the national stage, science as the arbiter of rationality has been given a humiliating demotion.

If I had read this question a year and a half ago, I would have noted that scientists (to be way too general) see themselves as serving the public good with their methodical approaches to discovery. Questioning the good of a do-gooder’s work naturally leads to defensiveness. Also, their paychecks depend largely on stacking the deck in the favor of positive perception. The same can be said of religions and religious do-gooders of course. (I’m in favor of doing good, so don’t get me wrong. It’s just that doing good is complicated.)

I also happen to think science is due for SUCH a radical shift that there’s a great deal of fear of the unknown (what will happen to MY little testable world?). It’s been brewing a long time, and with the current administrative demotion, at least in the US, many would rather deal with it by not dealing at all — choosing instead to get drunk once again on their own strange brews.

Original publish date Jan 23, 2018